<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Andrew Boraine &#187; Urban sprawl</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewboraine.com/tag/urban-sprawl/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewboraine.com</link>
	<description>Cities for People</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2011 14:23:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>One step forward, two steps backwards: the densification debate continues</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewboraine.com/2010/09/one-step-forward-two-steps-backwards-the-densification-debate-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewboraine.com/2010/09/one-step-forward-two-steps-backwards-the-densification-debate-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cape Town]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Innovations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apartheid]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City densification policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[City of Cape Town]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ella Smook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sustainable development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban sprawl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewboraine.com/?p=2919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>I reported earlier this month that the City of Cape Town has approved a new city densification policy (<a href="http://www.andrewboraine.com/2010/09/city-of-cape-town-considers-new-urban-densification-policy/" target="_blank">City of Cape Town considers new urban densification policy</a>). It appears that I was mistaken. It&#8217;s now back to the drawing board, as Ella Smook&#8217;s article in the <em>Cape Argus</em> (see below)&#8230;</p>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewboraine.com/2010/09/one-step-forward-two-steps-backwards-the-densification-debate-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anti-urban bias continues</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewboraine.com/2010/03/anti-urban-bias-continues/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewboraine.com/2010/03/anti-urban-bias-continues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 06:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Global Cities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Local Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-urban bias]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urban sprawl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewboraine.com/?p=1091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>The often confused or lukewarm policy of national governments towards cities in particular and urban areas in general is not confined to South Africa. Here is a good article in the <a href="http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2010/03/05/why_the_anti_urban_bias/" target="_blank">Boston Globe </a>about continuing anti-urban bias in US federal government policy.</p>
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewboraine.com/2010/03/anti-urban-bias-continues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

